The analysis of some aspects of the technique can help to
explain the athlete’s performance, injuries and his/her future possibilities.
With the information that we present in this blog I’m not intended to replace a
scientifically organized evaluation process, but just to play with the
available information.
Mr. Sogard has a reported groin strain in 2009 and a back
strain that kept him out of the game for about 60 days in 2012.
The analysis of his running technique shows an external
rotation of his feet creating a landing with the external frontal aspect of his
feet. This rotation also generates a torque at the knee level. As a consequence
of his feet position in the ground, the push-off is happening with a non-efficient
and risky foot-leg-ground angle.
|
Complete extension of the right leg, efficient push-off |
|
External rotation of the left foot before landing |
|
Foot in angle in relation to the direction of the running |
|
Push-off with foot in angle generates torque at the knee level |
|
External rotation of the left foot during landing |
|
External rotation of the right foot during landing |
|
Landing with ankles tense in front of the hip with the heel |
During batting, his left foot remains in the same position
long after the bat contact the ball creating a torque at the knee level.
Even though the hip rotates some degrees during the swing
phase, it stops immediately before the bat contacts the ball. Because the upper
body continues rotating, it generates 1) an extra effort of the upper body 2) an
increment of load in the lower back.
|
Initial position |
|
Hip and Shoulders rotation. Left foot remains in place |
|
Hip and Shoulders rotation. Left foot remains in place |
|
Hip stops rotation and Shoulders continues rotating. Foot remains in place |
Conclusions: High risk of injury in the right knee and lower
back during batting aggravated by the running technique. A moderate risk in the
left knee.
Comments
Post a Comment